Tuesday, March 20, 2012
The Truth About Industry Standards
Saturday, February 4, 2012
"Playing Both Sides of the Net" by Edna Landau
1. Your artist is contracted to play with the New York Philharmonic on a Tuesday evening in February and has a first rehearsal with the Los Angeles Philharmonic on Wednesday afternoon at 2:00 pm. There is a flight from New York on Wednesday morning, leaving at 7:00 am and getting in at 10:30 am. The orchestra is insisting that the artist must be in L.A. the night before the first rehearsal, especially because of the possibility of inclement weather. The artist is unwilling to give up either engagement and insists that you convince the orchestra that a 10:30 am arrival in L.A. on the day of the first rehearsal should be fine. They argue that in the worst case scenario, they can perform the concerto on only one rehearsal. In this instance, which client do you favor? The manager needs to view the Los Angeles Philharmonic as a highly valued long-term client, with the awareness that taking a belligerent stance that could potentially affect the artistic quality of the scheduled concerts is not wise. If the worst happens, the relationship between manager and orchestra can be seriously compromised and it may also take a long while before the artist is re-engaged. That said, if artist and conductor have performed the work together before and it is not an unfamiliar work to the orchestra, there might be some room to persuade the orchestra to take a chance, since they will presumably still have the dress rehearsal together. If the orchestra doesn’t agree, especially since it can be extremely complicated to change rehearsal orders at the last minute, it is the manager's job to convince the artist that they will actively pursue the next possible opportunity to bring artist and orchestra together.
2. The Toronto Symphony has engaged an artist for subscription concerts. At the time when the contract was issued, they asked for a clause stating that the artist would attend a post-concert reception. The artist’s manager consulted with the artist who asked that the presenter accept wording indicating he would make best efforts to attend. He did not want to be contractually bound in the event he took ill and felt he couldn’t do anything more than the concert. The concert day arrived. The artist learned that very day that his best friend from conservatory days was driving 200 miles to attend the concert and wanted to have dinner afterwards. He would be leaving at 6:00 am the next morning. The artist asked the manager to check with the presenter if it would suffice for him to meet VIP’s in the green room and be excused from the reception. He clearly recalled never having contractually agreed to any post-concert activity. The presenter informed the manager that their largest donor, who had funded the concert, was hosting the reception and would not take kindly to a fleeting appearance by the artist. Their relationship with that donor could also be in jeopardy. Whose arm should the manager twist? Neither. The artist should be reminded that the presenter might well be in a position to re-engage them far into the future and it would behoove them to put their professional priorities first. At the same time, the manager might inquire as to whether the artist could attend for a brief while (not to exceed 30 minutes) and whether the donor could be sure to be accessible at that time. They could also check whether the artist’s guest could attend. If the answer is full reception or nothing, the artist should accede to the request, as it was known from the beginning. If, on the other hand, the artist asked to be excused due to illness, which is presumably obvious to the presenter and the donor, the artist’s health should be of paramount concern and a backstage meet and greet might suffice.
3. An artist of some renown is being engaged for a recital in a major city where there are two suitable venues. One has a capacity of 800 and the other has a capacity of 1500. The artist already played once before in the smaller hall and wants to now play in the larger one because they view it as being more prestigious. The presenter only sold 500 seats to the artist’s last recital and feels it is too big a stretch to move to the larger hall. The risk of losing considerable money is too great and they think it would be far better for themselves and the artist to be able to advertise a sold out concert. The artist wants the manager to hold firm with regard to the larger venue. What to do? No manager wants to see a presenter lose money and an artist shouldn’t either. If the artist is adamant, one solution might be for the manager to propose a box office split in the larger venue that would ensure that the presenter’s reasonable and well documented expenses are covered, with the artist receiving an agreed upon fee (perhaps what they would have received in the smaller hall). Any remaining box office income could then be split by the two parties as agreed. The manager will want to stay on top of the presenter's venue and marketing costs and the presenter may request that the artist offer a program that is not their most esoteric. Some presenters might prefer not to share their event budget with the manager but rather to pay a guaranteed fee plus bonus payments when certain pre-established levels of ticket sales are reached.
Friday, December 2, 2011
Washingtonian Magazine Names Brian Goldstein to its 2011 List of Best Entertainment Lawyers
Washingtonian magazine has named Brian Taylor Goldstein to its 2011 list of Washington's Best Entertainment Lawyers. Brian was named as one of the "Stars of the Bar" in the area of Performing Arts and Entertainment and was recognized as among the top 10 "dealmakers" who "represent authors, athletes, and other clients in media and the arts."
The Washingtonian's "Best Lawyers" list, which is now available in the December 2011 issue, highlights "the very best in legal talent" within the Washington, DC metropolitan area.
With offices in Fairfax, Virginia and New York City, Brian is a partner in FTM Arts Law, the entertainment division of the law firm of Fettmann, Tolchin and Majors, P.C., and Managing Director of the arts management and consulting firm of FTM International.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Beware of Scams Involving Fake IRS Emails, Chinese Website Registrations, and Free Money!
In this scam, fraudsters modify a genuine IRS form, the W-8BEN, Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding, to request detailed personal and financial information. This could include nationality, passport number, bank account and PIN numbers, spouse's name and mother's maiden name, or other personal or financial information or security measures for financial accounts. The scammers may use the genuine form number and name or may make up a new form number, such as W-4100B2. They either e-mail or fax the form or letter. If only a letter, the letter itself contains the request for the personal and financial information. The letter, which claims to come from the IRS, states that the recipient will face additional taxes unless he or she quickly faxes the required information to the number provided by the scammer.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
What the $%#@??? The IRS Has Changed the CWA Procedures... Again!!!
***Because IRS Form 8233 works differently for performing artists and non-performing artists, here’s a quick review regarding IRS Form 8233: This form is used to claim an exemption from withholding on compensation earned by a foreign independent contractor. The “exemption” is, in most cases, based on a tax treaty. Most, but not all, treaties treat compensation earned by performing artists differently than that earned by non-performing artists. These treaties put a cap on the amount an individual performing artist may earn tax-free in the U.S. For example, the U.S./U.K. tax treaty permits a performing artist who is a resident of the U.K. to earn up to $20,000 tax free. However, if an artist earns more than $20,000, the entire amount earned is subject to U.S. tax. As discussed in detail on the Artists from Abroad website (www.artistsfromabroad.org), the exemption available to performing artists is usually inapplicable at the withholding stage. It would apply only to claim a refund from withholding when the artist files his or her US tax refund. (This is because it’s impossible for the person paying the performing artist to know whether or not the performer will be over or under the cap at the end of the tax year.) By contrast, tax treaties rarely impose the type of cap referenced above on independent contractors who are non-performing artists. If a non-performing artist otherwise qualifies for an exemption, the non-performer’s entire U.S. income is usually exempt from tax in the U.S. For this reason, these individuals may submit Form 8233 at the withholding stage to claim the treaty exemption from tax and avoid any withholding.
- The IRS has designated a new mailing address for CWA requests. It is:
- Be sure to respond to any IRS questions about your CWA request in a timely manner! If the IRS asks for additional information, and they don’t hear back from you within a certain time frame, your CWA request may be denied, and letters will be sent to each venue on your artist’s tour directing the venue to withholding 30% of the gross performance fee.
- Regardless of your level of frustration, always be nice when dealing with the IRS! They have all of the power, and you have none. Remember that the IRS regards the CWA as a privilege, not a right, and if your request is denied, there is no appeal process. Besides, in my experience, it’s usually much easier to give the IRS what they are asking for rather than arguing with them about why they don’t need it, why the information and paperwork is burdensome, and why foreign artists are no longer willing to tour the U.S. Having said that, I must also note that all of the IRS agents I have dealt with in the CWA division have been friendly and helpful when presented with calm and reasonable questions and comments and you express a willingness to comply. Also, bear in mind that IRS agents can and will be inconsistent in their application of the rules for obtaining a CWA. This is partly because they are themselves trying to figure out the new rules and requirements.
- Bookmark the following websites for future reference:
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
IRS Steps Up Enforcement of Foreign Artist Tax Withholding!
- Budgets are being more closely scrutinized, and artists are required to provide much more detail than in the past. For instance, if an artist's budget shows a cost of $10,000 for airfares, the IRS will require detailed information as to how the $10,000 was computed, i.e., exactly how many airfares are included, what is the origination and destination point of each ticket, etc. If a budget includes a cost of $5,000 for hotel, the IRS will require information on how many rooms this figure covers, and in what cities.
- Even more importantly, the IRS now requires an artist requesting a CWA to identify, by name and country of residence, each member of the artist’s touring party, including each performer who will be performing with the artist. Each performer touring with the artist must be in compliance with their U.S. tax returns. If any performer is not in compliance with their U.S. tax returns, the IRS will direct that 30% of that person's income must be withheld for U.S. taxes.
- The most enduring misconception is that the W-8BEN form is an easy cure-all for U.S. tax issues, including tax withholding. FTM Arts Law is being contacted more and more frequently by frustrated managers and agents who are accustomed to avoiding all withholding by issuing a W-8BEN form to each venue or presenter. Many venues and presenters – particularly those receiving DWLs – will no longer accept this form to exempt the artist from tax withholding. In fact, the W-8BEN is applicable only in very limited circumstances. For a W-8BEN to be applicable, the foreign group or company cannot be owned by the artists themselves. This excludes almost all quartets, bands, or any ensemble where the artists in any way split the profits. In most situations, such groups, even if they are legitimately incorporated entities in their home countries, must obtain a CWA, or the presenters will be required to withhold 30%. And a W-8BEN is never applicable for an individual artist, even if he/she has formed his/her own corporation. Which brings us to...
- The second most popular misconception, which is perpetuated by U.S. accountants unfamiliar with taxation issues for nonresidents, is that a foreign artist may avoid U.S. taxation and withholding altogether by forming a U.S. corporation. As an example, we currently are working to resolve the tax quagmires of several foreign artists who had set up U.S. corporations through which all of their U.S. tour income and expenses would flow. In most cases, this plan will NOT avoid U.S. taxes – it will only cause the artist to incur late filing and payment penalties, interest, and unnecessary accountant fees. Most tax treaties provide that income paid to a foreign performing artist through a corporation (U.S. or otherwise) is attributable to the artist individually, and not to the corporation. Our clients - who believed they were in compliance with U.S. tax law under their accountants' plan - are now paying the consequences. One artist in particular has been advised by the IRS that he must file past individual U.S. tax returns going back seven years before the artist will be eligible for a CWA!
- There is a wealth of information on www.ArtistsFromAbroad.org. This website, sponsored by the League of American Orchestras and the Association of Performing Arts Presenters, is regularly updated by FTM Arts Law. The site includes a multitude of information on visa and tax issues for foreign artists, including what artists are eligible for a W-8BEN tax exemption, and how to obtain a CWA. However, if you find the volume of information on this site a bit overwhelming, you might first…
- Go to www.FTMArtsLaw-pc.com. Our website contains additional free information and resources that simplify the legal issues involved in U.S. tours of foreign artists - including a foreign artist taxation memorandum which summarizes the information contained in the Artists from Abroad website. (Its also a good resource to print out and provide to anyone who thinks you're making this stuff up!)
- Go to www.IRS.gov. The Internal Revenue Service's website, though not known for its depth of wit and good humor, is a valuable source of information that includes complete tax treaties, and forms and publications that offer guidance as to both withholding and taxation. Publications relevant to taxation of foreign guest artists are Publication 515 ("Withholding of Tax on Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities"); Publication 519 ("U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens") and Publication 901 ("U.S. Tax Treaties").